The Effect of Modified Banana Flour and Soy Flour Ratio on The Organoleptic Parameters of Snack Bar as Supplementary Food in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of modified banana flour and soybean flour formulations on the organoleptic properties of snack bars. The formulation used in this study was based on the ratio of differences in the use of modified kepok banana flour with soy flour. The design used in this study was a complete randomized design (RAL). The factors used in this study were 5 formulations with a ratio of modified kepok banana flour and soybean flour, namely F1 (100:0), F2 (70:30), F3 (50:50), F4 (30:70), and F5 (0:100). The response measured in this design is a hedonic test (favorability level), which includes taste, aroma, color, and texture attributes. The selected snack bar formula results from the hedonic test are then tested for water content, protein content, and fiber content. Based on the results of hedonic test analysis on 5 formulas using the ANOVA test, it showed significant results (p<0.05) for the hedonic test response of taste, aroma, and texture attributes and an insignificant response (p>0.05) to the hedonic test of color attributes. Formula F3 with a modified ratio of banana flour and soy flour (50:50) is the most preferred formula based on taste attributes (4.48), aroma (4.40), and texture (4.37). A snack bar with formula F3 has a moisture content of 4.58%, a protein content of 18.28%, and a fiber content of 13.42%. The high protein and fiber content in this snack bar makes it suitable as a supplementary food for consumption by people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
References
Afandi, F. A., Wijaya, C. H., Faridah, D. N., Suyatma, N. E., & Jayanegara, A. (2021). Evaluation of various starchy foods: A systematic review and meta-analysis on chemical properties affecting the glycemic index values based on in vitro and in vivo experiments. Foods, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020364
Agustina, Faridah, D.N., & Jenie, B. S. L. (2016). Pengaruh Retrogradasi Dan Perlakuan Kelembaban Panas Terhadap Kadar Pati Resisten Tipe III Daluga. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Industri Pangan, 27(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2016.27.1.78
Ahmad, E., Sargeant, J. A., Yates, T., Webb, D. R., & Davies, M. J. (2022). Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Physical Function: A Growing Problem. Diabetology, 3(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology3010003
AOAC. (2005). Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analitycal Chemists. 18th ed. Maryland: AOAC International. William Harwitz (ed). United States of America.
Cho, Y., Park, H.-S., Huh, yung W., & Seo, S. H. (2022). Prevalence and risk of diabetic complications in young-onset versus late-onset type 2 diabetes melitus. Diabetes & Metabolism, 48(6).
International Diabetes Federation. (2021). Diabetes Atlas tenth Edition 2021. International Diabetes Federation.
Kasim, R., Liputo, S. A., Limonu, M., & Kadir Sunarto. (2018). Snack Food Bars Rendag Indeks Glikemik Berbahan Dasar Pangan Lokal. Ideas Publishing.
Kaur, L., Dhul, Sanja B., Kumar, P., & Singh, A. (2020). Banana starch: Properties, description, and modified variations - A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 165, 2096–2102.
Kusnandar, F. (2019). Kimia Komponen Makro (Darojah, Lia). Bumi Aksara.
Kustanti, I. (2017). Formulasi Biskuit Rendah Indeks Glikemik (Batik) Dengan Subtitusi Tepung Pisang Klutuk (Musa Balbisiana Colla) Dan Tepung Tempe. Jurnal Aplikasi Teknologi Pangan, 6(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.17728/jatp.217
Mahmud, M. K., Hermana, Z.N.A., A.R.R., N.I., H.B., Bernadus., T. (2018). Tabel Komposisi Pangan Indonesia. Persatuan Ahli Gizi Indonesia. Jakarta.
Małecki, J., Tomasevic, I., Djekic, I., & Sołowiej, B. G. (2020). The effect of protein source on the physicochemical, nutritional properties and microstructure of high-protein bars intended for physically active people. Foods, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101467
Manullang, V. A., Rahadiyanti, A., Pratiwi, S. N., & Afifah, D. N. (2020). Glycemic index, starch, and protein digestibility in tempeh gembus cookies. Journal of Food Quality, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5903109
Mawarno, B. A. S., & Putri, A. S. (2022). Karakteristik Fisikokimia dan Sensoris Snack Bar Tinggi Protein Bebas Gluten dengan Variasi Tepung Beras, Tepung Kedelai dan Tepung Tempe. AgriHealth: Journal of Agri-Food, Nutrition and Public Health, 3(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.20961/agrihealth.v3i1.60632
Nurdin, N. M., Navratilova, H. F., Ekawidyani, K. R., Pratiwi, D., & Kurniawan, M. Y. (2020). Soy Flour-Based Snack Bar as Potential Snack Alternative for Diabetes Melitus. Jurnal Gizi dan Pangan, 15(3), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.25182/jgp.2020.15.3.125-132
PERKENI. (2021). Pedoman Pengelolaan dan Pencegahan Diabetes Melitus tipe 2 Dewasa di Indonesia. PB PERKENI.
Rani, H., Zulfahmi, Z., & Widodo, Y.R. (2013). Optimasi Proses Pembuatan Bubuk (Tepung) Kedelai. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian Politeknik Negeri Lampung, 13(3), 188–196.
Reynolds, A. N., Akerman, A. P., & Mann, J. (2020). Dietary fibre and whole grains in diabetes management: Systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS Medicine, 17(3), e1003053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003053
Rios, F. T., Amaya, A. A., Lobo, M. O., & Samman, N. C. (2020). Design and Acceptability of a Multi-Ingredients Snack Bar Employing Regional Products with High Nutritional Value. 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020053014
Saeedi, P., Petersohn, I., Salpea, P., Malanda, B., Karuranga, S., Unwin, N., Colagiuri, S., Guariguata, L., Motala, A. A., Ogurtsova, K., Shaw, J. E., Bright, D., & Williams, R. (2019). Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843
Sardi, M., Nurhabibah, M., Tobing, B., Widani Putri, A., Nasution, A. M., Pratiwi, A., Aldelwis, K., Butar, B., Putri, R. N., Tumangger, H., & Sahira, S. (2021). Klaim Kandungan Zat Gizi pada Berbagai Kudapan (Snack) Tinggi Serat: Literature Review Nutritional Claim in Different Types of High Fiber Snack: Literature Review. 1(1), 39–45.
Steele, T. J., Steele, C. C., Maningat, C. C., Seib, P. A., Haub, M. D., & Rosenkranz, S. K. (2022). Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses of Healthy Humans to a Nutrition Bar with or without Added Fibersym® RW, a Cross-Linked Phosphorylated RS4-Type Resistant Wheat Starch. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113804
Sun, L., Tan, K. W. J., Han, C. M. S., Leow, M. K. S., & Henry, C. J. (2017). Impact of preloading either dairy or soy milk on postprandial glycemia, insulinemia and gastric emptying in healthy adults. European Journal of Nutrition, 56(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-1059-y
Syafii, F. (2023). Kimia Pangan Komponen Makro (1st ed.). Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia.
Syafii, F., & Yani, A. (2022). Effect Of Kepok Banana Flour Modification Process On Resistant Starch Content As A Functional Food Ingredient. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Handling Non-Communicable Diseases Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Semarang.
Syafii, F., & Yudianti, Y. (2022). Analisis Kadar Pati Resisten, Total Serat dan Daya Terima Kabosol Tersubstitusi Tepung Pisang Kepok Termodifikasi. Jurnal Kesehatan Manarang, 8(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.33490/jkm.v8i1.590
Szydłowska, A., Zielińska, D., Trząskowska, M., Neffe-Skocińska, K., Łepecka, A., Okoń, A., & Kołożyn-Krajewska, D. (2022). Development of Ready-to-Eat Organic Protein Snack Bars: Assessment of Selected Changes of Physicochemical Quality Parameters and Antioxidant Activity Changes during Storage. Foods, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223631
Triana, R. N., Andarwulan, N., Adawiyah, D. R., Agustin, D., Kesenja, R., & Gitapratiwi, D. (2016). Karakteristik Fisikokimia dan Sensori Mi dengan Substitusi Tepung Kentang Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Noodle with Potato Flour Substitution. Jurnal Mutu Pangan, 3(1), 35–44.
USDA [United States Department of Agriculture]. (2018). Full report (all nutrients) 19406, snacks, granola bars, soft, uncoated, nut and raisin. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference.
Wiranata, I. G. A. G., Puspaningrum, D. H. D., & Kusumawati, I. G. A. W. (2017). Formulasi dan karakteristik nutrimat bar berbasis tepung kacang kedelai (Glycine max. L) dan tepung kacang merah (phaseolus vulgaris. L) sebagai makanan pasien kemoterapikacang kedelai. Jurnal Gizi Indonesia, 5(2), 133–139.
Zaddana, C., Nurmala, S., & Oktaviyanti, T. (2021). Snack Bar Berbahan Dasar Ubi Ungu dan Kacang Merah sebagai Alternatif Selingan untuk Penderita Diabetes Melitus Snack Bar Based on Purple Sweet Potato and Red Bean as an Alternative Snack for Diabetes Melitus. Amerta Nutr, 260–275. https://doi.org/10.20473/amnt.v5i3.2021
Copyright (c) 2023 Firdaus Syafii, Ahmad Yani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases Prevention and Control applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) License, or other comparable licenses that allow free and unrestricted use to articles we publish. If you submit your manuscript for publication by the Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases Prevention and Control, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. If your institution or funder requires your work or materials to be published under a different license or dedicated to the public domain - for example, Creative Commons 1.0 Universal (CC0) or Open Governmental License - this is permitted for those licenses where the terms are equivalent to or more permissive than CC BY.